 |
|
|
Countering the Stigma of Mental Illnesses
By Stephanie Sampson, M.A.
It's difficult enough to cope with an anxiety disorder without having to cope
with other people's ideas of who you are. Yet people with anxiety disorders
and other mental conditions continue to be viewed by many Americans as being
weak-willed, having a character flaw, or worse-being "crazy," incompetent,
or even violent. Such misperceptions are part of the stigma of mental illnesses.
Defined as a mark of
shame, disgrace or disapproval that is imposed on people with a mental illness
by others, stigma may have many consequences, including rejection by family,
broken friendships, low self-esteem or job discrimination. Reversing negative
perceptions of anxiety disorders has been a long-term goal of the Anxiety Disorders
Association of America. "People with anxiety disorders have in the past
been perceived as the 'the worried well,' but this is misleading, anxiety disorders
are real illnesses," says Jerilyn Ross, M.A., L.I.C.S.W., President and
CEO of the ADAA. "If we say someone is 'just very shy' in social situations
or 'is imagining things' when having a panic attack, we stigmatize them as individuals
and deny their suffering."
Stigma Hurts
Unfortunately, stigma is still with us in the 21st century. A landmark study
by the Indiana Consortium for Mental Health Services Research (ICMHSR) looked
at public attitudes toward mental illnesses between 1950-1996 and concluded
that, "there is little evidence that the stigma of mental illness has been
reduced in contemporary American society." And stigma hurts. That same
historical study showed that even in the late '90s, "levels of social rejection
remain distressingly high" for people with a mental illness:
The number of
people who associate mental illnesses with antisocial behavior doubled between
1950 and 1996.
68% would be "definitely" or "probably unwilling"
to have someone with a mental illness marry into their family.
58% would be "definitely" or "probably unwilling"
to work closely on the job with someone with a mental illness.
56% would be "definitely" or "probably unwilling"
to spend an evening socializing with a person with a mental illness.
But while surveys can
be useful in gauging attitudes of society at large, it is the effect of stigma
on individual lives that most concerns researchers like Otto F. Wahl, Ph.D.,
Professor of Psychology at George Mason University in Fairfax, Virginia. "If
we are going to truly eradicate stigma, we need to have a more concrete, practical
and personalized understanding of its effects-that is, how stigma makes people
feel and how it affects treatment and recovery," he says.
Dr. Wahl has collected
the experiences of almost 1,400 consumers of mental health services to get a
first-hand account of the effect of stigma. The results, compiled in the book
Telling is Risky Business: Mental Health Consumers Confront Stigma, demonstrate
how deeply some are wounded by stigma (see box, below). For example, the survey
revealed that those with a mental illness often or very often avoided telling
others that they have a mental illness (47%); worried that others will view
them unfavorably (56%); have been treated unfairly (46%); and have been shunned
or avoided by others (26%).
In addition to the social
effects, stigma can have negative and long-lasting consequences on self-esteem.
"Stigma may become internalized, and the individual may come to share the
same beliefs as others and view themselves in similarly disparaging ways,"
says Dr. Wahl. Indeed, stigma can be worse than the illness itself. "There's
no doubt many struggle with a double burden-the disabling effects of their condition
and the equally disabling effects of prejudice," says Jean Arnold, co-creator
of the National Stigma Clearinghouse.
The Role of the Media
The media remain the public's most influential source of information on mental
illnesses. Unfortunately, many of the stories and programs we hear and read
contain inaccuracies and denigrate those with mental illnesses. "The media,
especially television, are a very powerful socializing agent," says Dr.
Wahl, who has studied media depiction of mental illnesses. "Because almost
every household in America has a television set, everyone-rich, poor, educated,
uneducated, urban, rural-gets the same message about mental illnesses. Thus,
the negative messages and violent images can become pervasive throughout society."
Negative socialization
regarding stigma may begin at an early age. Until 2000, no studies had been
published on the mental health content of children's programming. The first,
a study of children's television programming in New Zealand and the U.S., concluded
"the frequent and casual use of fundamentally disrespectful vocabulary
[such as 'nuts,' 'wacko,' and 'freaky' in episodes reviewed] demonstrate for
children that such expressions are acceptable or even funny.
Particularly disturbing
is the media's perpetuation of the mentally ill as violent and dangerous. "Mental
illness is a common theme in movies, television, plays and books," says
Ms. Arnold, whose clearinghouse keeps tabs on instances of stigma in the media.
"Regrettably, many of those portrayals are extremely negative and skewed
toward making people with mental illnesses seem violent." Over 70% of major
characters with a mental illness in prime time television dramas are portrayed
as violent; more than one fifth are shown as killers. The typical newspaper
depiction of individuals with mental illnesses shows them to be psychotic, unemployed,
transient, and dangerous-not as happy, productive members of a family or community.
Changing these stereotypes
will take time, but Dr. Wahl offers three strategies for the future:
1. educating those responsible for media depictions of mental illnesses, such
as screenwriters and news reporters;
2. reaching future writers, editors and producers through training curricula;
and
3. engaging in grassroots advocacy to create pressure on media organizations
to change media stereotyping.
Making Progress
Not all the news is bad. First, anecdotal and some empirical evidence exists
that the media is changing their portrayals of mental illnesses. A 1999 content
analysis comparing newspaper coverage of mental illnesses in 1989 and 1999 showed
the ratio of negative depictions to positive ones to be 2:1 in 1999, down considerably
from a 4:1 ratio in 1989. "However that still means that mental illnesses
and people with mental illnesses are being portrayed in a negative light twice
as often as a positive one," says Dr. Wahl, one of the study's authors.
Second, on a broader
scale, the ICMHSR survey revealed that Americans' understanding of mental illnesses
has broadened over the last five decades to encompass a wide range of disorders,
including anxiety, depression and substance abuse. The public also sees a combination
of factors-life stressors, genetics and chemical imbalances-as the cause of
mental illnesses rather than a bad character or bad parenting. "Another
positive trend affecting both patients and the public is a hopeful attitude
toward recovery, says Jean Arnold. The ICMHSR survey showed that Americans increasingly
recognize that mental health problems will improve if treated.
Third, the number of
anti-stigma reports, conferences and organizations is on the rise. "There's
been more activity on this issue in the last five years than in the previous
20," says Ms. Arnold. "For example, when we started the National Stigma
Clearinghouse, there really wasn't any other organization monitoring media coverage
of mental illnesses. Now the clearinghouse website has links to 40 different
groups that give a high priority to fighting prejudice and discrimination."
Combating Stigma
By its nature, stigma puts people into categories. This conveniently relieves
one of the burdens of seeing people as individuals and treating them as such.
Thus, fighting stigma is best achieved by personalizing it. This means speaking
up about its effects on you as someone with an anxiety disorder, speaking out
when you hear incorrect or negative statements, and speaking with others to
find common ground for recovery and advocacy efforts (see below, "What
You Can Do to Fight Stigma"). "We took this approach in the Clearinghouse,"
says Ms. Arnold. "For the first time, we gave people a voice and a way
to take concrete action. And it's very satisfying indeed to respond to the stigmatizer."
Between 1990 and 1996, the Clearinghouse published 64 monthly reports with hundreds
of examples of stigma submitted by media watchers. This watchdog function has
been taken over by National Alliance of the Mentally Ill's Stigma Alerts program
and the National Mental Health Association's Stigma Watch.
Although much of the
research conducted on stigma relates to schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and
depression, mental health advocates encourage thinking of stigma as an issue
that touches all of us. Anxiety disorders, for example, occur very frequently
with other psychiatric illnesses, including depression and substance abuse.
"Stigma applied to one person or one psychiatric disorder is a stigma applied
to everyone with a mental illness," says Ross. "And it's up to each
of us to fight it where we can."
For more information
on fighting stigma:
Anxiety Disorders
Association of America's Advocacy Center
www.adaa.org
National Association
for the Mentally Ill
www.nami.org
National Mental
Health Association's Stigma Watch
www.nmha.org/newsroom/stigma/index.cfm
National Mental
Health Awareness Campaign
www.nostigma.org
National Stigma
Clearinghouse
http://community-2.webtv.net/stigmanet/STIGMAHOMEPAGE/index.html
Close
Window
|